ArticleNature communications2026
Systematic background selection with BasCoD enhances contrastive dimension reduction in single cell genomics.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrastive Dimension Reduction: A Systematic Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics · 2026Article
- Systematic background selection with BasCoD enhances contrastive dimension reduction in single cell genomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In single-cell experiments spanning diverse conditions, distinguishing variation specific to one condition (e.g., treatment) from shared or background variation (e.g., control) is critical for uncovering treatment-specific molecular responses. However, these studies typically yield ultra-high-dimensional data, necessitating effective dimension reduction for reliable biological interpretation. Contrastive dimension reduction methods address this challenge by identifying low-dimensional features enriched in a target dataset relative to a background dataset that captures shared variation. Despite their growing utility, the success of such methods critically depends on the choice of background, yet no formal criterion exists for evaluating or selecting backgrounds. To address this gap, we introduce BasCoD, a statistical testing framework based on spectral subspace inclusion theory, that enables rigorous evaluation and systematic selection of background datasets. Applying BasCoD across a range of single-cell datasets, we show that it effectively identifies suitable backgrounds, substantially improving the contrast and interpretability of the resulting target representations. We further demonstrate how BasCoD can guide the design of contrastive analyses in large-scale single-cell experiments conducted under heterogeneous conditions and elucidate potential interaction effects in perturbation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.