Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844632›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Systematic background selection with BasCoD enhances contrastive dimension reduction in single cell genomics.

Kwangmoon Park, Zhongxuan Sun, Ruiqi Liao, Emery H Bresnick, Sündüz Keleş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contrastive Dimension Reduction: A Systematic Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kwangmoon ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zhongxuan SunDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5682-2078
Ruiqi LiaoWisconsin Blood Cancer Research Institute, Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-3349
Emery H BresnickWisconsin Blood Cancer Research Institute, Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-5654
Sündüz KeleşDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA. keles@stat.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-0922

Funding

Statistical Methods for the Analysis of ChlP-chip DataR01HG003747 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KELES, SUNDUZ · 2007 to 2024
$4.8M
Statistical methods for co-expression network analysis of population-scale scRNA-seq dataR21HG012881 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KELES, SUNDUZ · 2023 to 2023
$408k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003747NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG012881U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) HG003747U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) HG012881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In single-cell experiments spanning diverse conditions, distinguishing variation specific to one condition (e.g., treatment) from shared or background variation (e.g., control) is critical for uncovering treatment-specific molecular responses. However, these studies typically yield ultra-high-dimensional data, necessitating effective dimension reduction for reliable biological interpretation. Contrastive dimension reduction methods address this challenge by identifying low-dimensional features enriched in a target dataset relative to a background dataset that captures shared variation. Despite their growing utility, the success of such methods critically depends on the choice of background, yet no formal criterion exists for evaluating or selecting backgrounds. To address this gap, we introduce BasCoD, a statistical testing framework based on spectral subspace inclusion theory, that enables rigorous evaluation and systematic selection of background datasets. Applying BasCoD across a range of single-cell datasets, we show that it effectively identifies suitable backgrounds, substantially improving the contrast and interpretability of the resulting target representations. We further demonstrate how BasCoD can guide the design of contrastive analyses in large-scale single-cell experiments conducted under heterogeneous conditions and elucidate potential interaction effects in perturbation studies.

Indexed as

GenomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsDimensionality ReductionHumans

Identifiers

PMID41844632
PMCPMC13144610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.