Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844628›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2026

Comprehensive nutritional analysis of 95 oat cultivars reveals large variability in nutritional profile: protein, starch, fat, β-glucan and fibre.

Nefeli Lampoglou, Atikur Rahman, Ewen Mullins, Aylin W Sahin, Cathal McCabe, Elke Arendt, André Brodkorb, Daniela Freitas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nefeli LampoglouTeagasc Moorepark Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Atikur RahmanTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Carlow, Ireland.
Ewen MullinsTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Carlow, Ireland.
Aylin W SahinSchool of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Cathal McCabeSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Elke ArendtSchool of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
André BrodkorbTeagasc Moorepark Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Daniela FreitasTeagasc Moorepark Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland. daniela.freitas@teagasc.ie.

Funding

Research Ireland 21/PATHS/9418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional composition determines whether oats can deliver established health benefits like cholesterol reduction, which requires specific β-glucan thresholds unachievable by consuming a standard serving of typical commercial cultivars. Current yield-focused breeding overlooks the substantial nutritional diversity within the species, limiting consumer access to nutritional profiles optimised for different nutritional targets and leaving the potential for enhanced health outcomes untapped. This study characterised the nutritional composition of 95 Irish-grown oat cultivars and compared field (2024) versus glasshouse (2023) grown samples from 21 cultivars. Key components showed wide variation, with fat displaying the largest range and starch the most consistency, with concentrations ranging as follows: protein 11.5-22.9%, starch 47.2-65.3%, fat 2.4-10.0%, ash 1.4-2.9%, β-glucan 2.8-6.6%, and calculated fibre-rich fraction 8.5-26.9% (dry matter basis). Glasshouse-grown samples had significantly higher protein, fibre-rich fraction, and ash than field-grown counterparts (p < 0.001). These findings reveal untapped potential for breeding oats with targeted nutritional profiles to support dietary recommendations and food industry applications.

Identifiers

PMID41844628
PMCPMC13144497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.