Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844617›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Reliable uncertainty estimates in deep learning with efficient Metropolis-Hastings algorithms.

Matthias Schmal, Patrick Mäder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthias SchmalData-intensive Systems and Visualization Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Thüringen, Germany. matthias.schmal@tu-ilmenau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0116-1238
Patrick MäderData-intensive Systems and Visualization Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Thüringen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-2707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approaching problems with data-driven models often requires reliable uncertainty estimates. Bayesian neural networks can offer these for deep learning models. Without the knowledge to set informative prior distributions, sampling methods such as Hamiltonian Monte Carlo are a robust choice. However, these come with prohibitive computational costs. We study two ways to incorporate computationally light-weight Metropolis-Hastings acceptance steps into deep neural networks and stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. The first method proposes noisy acceptance steps computed on batched training samples rather than the entire set during the simulation of the stochastic dynamics accepting a small minima preserving bias. The second method sacrifices bias-free sampling of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in favor of stochastic gradient driven trajectories. While the first is analytically plausible, the second is inspired by the Hamiltonian ensemble concept. Prediction accuracy is improved by up to 5.8% over deterministic and by up to 4.3% over Bayesian approaches while still guaranteeing calibration of the predictions. We observe that sampling methods facilitate model predictions with merely a third of the ensemble while maintaining prediction accuracy. In conclusion, the methods combine efficiency and regularization of stochastic gradients, showing strong performance despite the sampling bias.

Identifiers

PMID41844617
PMCPMC12996495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.