Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844538›Full record

Trial reportDevelopmental science2026

Remote Text-Supplemented Audiobook Intervention Supports Children's Explicit and Incidental Vocabulary Learning.

Halie A Olson, Ola Ozernov-Palchik, Xochitl M Arechiga, John D E Gabrieli

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Halie A OlsonMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-6795
Ola Ozernov-PalchikMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Xochitl M ArechigaMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
John D E GabrieliMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Understanding how experience shapes language development through comparisons of large language models and neural representationsF32HD117580 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Halie Ann Olson · 2025 to 2026
$155k
Chan Zuckerberg InitiativeNational Science Foundation 1745302National Science Foundation H.A.ONIH HHS F32-HD100064NIH HHS F32HD117580NIH HHS H.A.ONIH HHS OO-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocabulary knowledge is foundational to educational success, but significant gaps exist between students with reading disabilities or those from disadvantaged backgrounds and their peers. These gaps have cascading effects, as children with lower vocabulary knowledge are less likely to acquire new words through independent reading and are less responsive to vocabulary instruction methods like read-alouds and explicit teaching. The effectiveness of explicit instruction relies on individualization, which typically places substantial demands on educators and thereby hinders the adoption of evidence-based methods. A potential solution is using audiobooks supplemented by explicit and individualized remote instruction from paraprofessionals. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) intervention study in which children listened to text-supplemented audiobooks, either alone or with scaffolded instructional support. Third and fourth-grade students (N = 314, age: mean (SD) = 9.47(0.57) years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (Audiobooks-Only, Audiobooks+Scaffold, or active control) for 8 weeks. Participants in the two audiobook intervention groups showed significant improvements in book-specific vocabulary, while the active control group showed no improvement. The effectiveness of the intervention varied by reading ability and socioeconomic status (SES): poor readers benefited only when audiobooks were paired with one-on-one scaffolding, whereas children from lower-SES backgrounds showed modest, nonsignificant gains from audiobook access alone and did not experience additional benefits from scaffolding. Additionally, the Audiobooks+Scaffold group spent more time listening to recommended audiobooks during the study. These findings suggest that text-supplemented audiobooks, particularly when combined with personalized support, can be a valuable tool for supporting vocabulary development in struggling readers. SUMMARY: Children successfully learned new vocabulary words by engaging with text-supplemented audiobooks. Vocabulary gains were largest amongst students who additionally received one-on-one remote scaffolding sessions throughout the intervention period. Poor readers only benefited when text-supplemented audiobooks were paired with one-on-one instructional support. Students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds showed smaller, nonsignificant gains from either component, suggesting a need for additional support to achieve comparable vocabulary growth.

Indexed as

LearningReadingVocabularyChildFemaleHumansMaleTeachingaudiobooksindependent readingrandomized controlled trial (RCT)remotesocioeconomic status (SES)vocabulary

Identifiers

PMID41844538
PMCPMC12995855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.