ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2026
Feasibility and safety of intercostal trocar-assisted laparoscopic liver resection in posterosuperior segments.
Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims: Posterosuperior (PS) liver resections present technical challenges, and there is limited evidence on the use of intercostal (IC) trocars. This study aims to describe our technique and assess its feasibility and safety in a series of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis between 2022 to 2025. Among 40 patients who underwent LLR of PS segments, an accessory right IC 5-mm port was utilized in 8 cases. Outcomes evaluated included intraoperative complications, conversion rates, blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, 90-day morbidity/mortality, and margin status. Results: Eight patients (62.5% female; mean age 50.5 ± 21.39 years; median body mass index 22.27 [IQR 20.8-29.81]) underwent LLR utilizing a single 5-mm IC port. The indications for surgery were liver adenoma (n = 3), colorectal liver metastases (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumor metastasis (n = 1), and hepatolithiasis (n = 1). The mean operative time was 422.5 ± 127.56 minutes, with a mean blood loss of 153.75 ± 58.29 mL, and no transfusions were necessary. There were no intraoperative complications, conversions, or deaths. All patients achieved negative margins (mean 10.25 ± 1.5 mm). The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 ± 0.93 days, and the 90-day morbidity rate was 0%. Conclusions: The use of a small IC port in LLR for PS segments is both feasible and safe, offering improved exposure without increasing morbidity. Larger, multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and to standardize indications, port size, and placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.