ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Assessment of Hearing Health Among Adults in Rural Health Clinics.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Hearing Health Among Adults in Rural Health Clinics.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHearing loss (HL) negatively impacts all aspects of health, yet poor access to hearing healthcare (HHC) among adults is a pervasive public health problem. The inaccessibility of HHC is amplified in rural adults. Rural health clinics (RHC) are a critical healthcare system tasked with improving health in rural communities and the objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of HL and the utilization of HHC within RHCs.
methodsUsing cross-sectional study design, adults were recruited from 10 RHC throughout rural Kentucky, mostly within Appalachia. The primary outcomes were (1) presence of HL on screening and (2) history of a hearing test within the last year and within the last 5 years. Additional outcomes included sociodemographic and overall health status. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were conducted.
resultsA total of 403 participants (mean age 51.1) were recruited. A total of 388 participants completed a hearing screening and 271 (70%) screened positive for HL, yet only 3.4% and 13.4% of participants had undergone a hearing test in the past 1 and 5 years, respectively. Adults with higher education levels were less likely to have HL (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26-0.86; p = 0.02). HL in this sample was associated with noise exposure (OR 1.97; CI 1.08 to 3.61; p = 0.03) and poorer mental health (OR 3.48; 95% CI 1.74-7.18; p = 0.001).
conclusionRural adults in RHC have a high prevalence of HL and low utilization of HHC. Promoting and expanding access to HHC within RHCs may improve hearing health among rural adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.