ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2026
Anatomical study of the dorsal scapular artery in cadavers and its clinical significance.
Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dorsal scapular artery (DSA) is one of the key arteries supplying the muscles of the upper back, along with the Suprascapular artery and the Subscapular artery. It lies close to the brachial plexus, making its variations important during regional blocks and flap surgeries. Variations in its origin, course, and relationships in different population groups, as well as its surgical and anaesthetic significance, emphasise its need for study. This descriptive study was performed following a standard dissection manual on 40 bilateral sides of embalmed human cadavers. The origin of the DSA was identified, and its relation to the brachial plexus was noted. DSA was traced until its termination. DSA originated from the subclavian artery in 95% and from the Thyrocervical trunk in 5% of specimens. The course of the artery varied with its origin. It passes through either between the superior and the middle trunk or between the middle and the inferior trunk of the brachial plexus when it arises from the Subclavian artery. It is always tracked above the superior trunk of the brachial plexus when arising from the Thyrocervical trunk. No significant sexual differences for laterality or course was observed. The artery terminated supplying the rhomboids in all the specimens. Knowledge of the anatomical course of the DSA will help improve the design of regional flaps involving the vessel, in diagnosing conditions such as thoracic outlet syndrome. The knowledge of the relationship between the DSA and the brachial plexus improves the effectiveness of nerve block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.