ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2026
Enhancing Service Quality and Empowerment in Government Clinics Through Continuous Quality Improvement of Community Score Cards: A Case Study From the Dominican Republic.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Dominican Republic offers universal, government-run health care through primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. Reliability and confidence in care have lower user satisfaction than other dimensions. Thus, the government aims to enhance relationships between service users and providers as a key health systems strengthening priority to improve primary care services. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: From 2018 to 2023, a global nonprofit organization implemented social accountability, using an adapted Community Score Card (CSC) process, in 10 government-run clinic sites in the Dominican Republic. Each site implemented multiple CSC cycles, which involved a facilitated dialogue process among service users, providers, and community leaders, prioritization, action planning, and implementation. We developed a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation toolkit to facilitate ongoing analysis and use of data for continuous quality improvement of the social accountability approach and sharing of the results with stakeholders. The toolkit includes components that span all steps in the CSC process, including tracking participation of key stakeholder groups, assessing CSC facilitation quality, scoring clinics on 4 defined global indicators (quality of care, availability of medical staff, availability of medicines, and community participation), tracking progress on action plans, tracking participants' level of empowerment over time, and assessing how interventions impacted change through periodic use of the Most Significant Change monitoring and evaluation technique. PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS: The data generated from the toolkit supported process improvements in the CSC approach, including the importance of youth leadership in social accountability and of achieving concrete change early on to drive the capacity for more complex change requiring vertical support. These iterative improvements to the CSC process resulted in empowerment and engagement of community members to drive change in government-run primary health clinics and improved perceptions of service quality. Case study data from the Dominican Republic show ongoing stakeholder participation, improvement across the 4 global indicators, and community empowerment, which collectively contribute to strengthening local health care services. The comprehensive toolkit supports efforts for continuous quality improvement while producing evidence locally, nationally, and globally for health systems strengthening and demonstrating the effectiveness of the CSC approach.
conclusionsThree key lessons emerged from the development of a CSC monitoring toolkit. First, a comprehensive toolkit centralizes data in one place and pulls together evidence from multiple sources. Second, a standardized toolkit allows for analysis at multiple levels. Finally, ensuring data are actionable locally is central to gathering complete, accurate data for continuous quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.