ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
TUSCAN: Tumor segmentation and classification analysis in spatial transcriptomics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HisToSpatialCNV: an interpretable deep learning method predicting spatial copy number variations from histopathology images.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A comparative study of statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in spatial transcriptomics.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A comparative study of statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of tumor cells is pivotal for understanding tumor heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment. Recent advances in spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) have revolutionized the way that transcriptomic profiles are characterized and have enabled the simultaneous quantification of transcript locations in intact tissue samples. SRT is a promising alternative method to study gene expression patterns in spatial domains. Nevertheless, the precise detection of tumor regions within intact tissue remains a great challenge. A common strategy for identifying tumor cells is via tumor-specific marker gene expression signatures, which are highly dependent on marker accuracy. Another effective approach is through aneuploid copy number alterations, as most types of cancer exhibit copy number abnormalities. Here, we introduce a novel computational method, called TUSCAN (TUmor Segmentation and Classification ANalysis in spatial transcriptomics), which constructs a spatial copy number variation profile to improve the accuracy of tumor region identification. TUSCAN combines gene information from SRT data and hematoxylin-and-eosin-staining image to annotate tumor sections and other benign tissues. We benchmark the performance of TUSCAN and several existing methods through the application to multiple datasets from different SRT platforms. We demonstrate that TUSCAN can effectively delineate tumor regions, with improved accuracy compared to other approaches. Additionally, the output of TUSCAN provides interpretable clonal evolution inferences that may lead to novel insights into disease development and potential druggable targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.