ArticlePloS one2026
Long-text caption generation for surgical image with a concept retrieval augmented large multimodal model.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical image captioning is critical for automated reporting and education but is currently limited by a lack of long-text datasets and the tendency of generic Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to hallucinate medical details. To address this, we present a comprehensive framework for long-text surgical captioning. First, we construct a verified long-text benchmark extending the EndoVis2018 dataset, utilizing an automated pipeline with expert-in-the-loop validation to transform brief triplets into rich narratives. Second, we investigate domain-specific adaptation strategies for MLLMs. We implement a surgical concept retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mechanism that dynamically injects specialized knowledge (instruments, actions) into the visual encoder, effectively mitigating domain-specific hallucinations common in generic models. Finally, recognizing the inadequacy of n-gram metrics for long medical text, we establish a robust evaluation protocol using clinically-aligned metrics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our data-centric and retrieval-enhanced approach significantly outperforms baselines in producing clinically accurate, coherent long descriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.