ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026
Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative CT Models to Compare Density Patterns Across Pelvic Fractures.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBetween 1990 and 2007, the population-adjusted incidence of pelvic ring fractures increased from 27.24 to 34.30 per 100 000 capita. Measuring bone density would aid in surgical planning for patient-specific treatment after traumatic pelvic injuries to decrease the need for repeat surgery. Opportunistic quantitative CT has recently been used to provide bone density data without the need for an additional measurement through dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry, in addition to providing more detailed information about the density distribution. The purpose of this study was to determine whether locations of pelvic fractures correlated with differences in bone density across the fracture and low-density regions.
methodAfter retrospective study of clinical CT scans for trauma patients taken on a calibrated CT scanner, 24 scans were included. Medical image processing software, three-dimensional Slicer, was used to segment the innominate bone while accounting for displacement. Density data analysis done through Python 3.10 compared proximal and distal segments and density by region of the innominate bone.
resultsOf these 47 fractures, 43 (91.5%) occurred in low-density regions. Along with this, we found an absolute mean difference of 16.29 mg/mL (P < 0.005) between proximal and distal segments of the fracture.
conclusionWith this being one of the first studies using quantitative CT to measure bone density across fractures, these data indicate that studying fractures using three-dimensional quantitative models is a useful method to analyze risk factors for pelvic fractures, both in trauma and osteoporotic fragility fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.