ReviewBlood advances2026
Venetoclax retreatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is biologically rational and clinically effective.
Review in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractVenetoclax therapy has evolved from continuous monotherapy to fixed-duration (FD) and minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided combination regimens in frontline and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Compared with continuous therapy, FD regimens are associated with a lower incidence of emergence of BCL2 mutations and distinct mechanisms of relapse, supporting the rationale for investigating venetoclax-based combination retreatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the key studies for venetoclax rechallenge and discuss the available clinical evidence. To date, 10 abstracts or published articles have reported on venetoclax retreatment, including continuous monotherapy or with FD/MRD-guided combinations with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab and obinutuzumab) or covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib). Patient and disease characteristics were heterogeneous across studies, with a substantial proportion of patients with high-risk disease (IGHV-unmutated or del17p/TP53 mutations). The median time off venetoclax following initial therapy ranged from 9 to 90 months. The reported overall response rates to retreatment ranged from 72% to 100%, and undetectable MRD rates in peripheral blood from 32% to 92%. Median progression-free survival, when available, ranged from 23 to 58 months. Optimal patient selection remains to be defined, but the depth of the initial venetoclax response and time to progression from last venetoclax exposure may predict rechallenge efficacy and are incorporated in new clinical trial criteria allowing previous FD venetoclax treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.