ArticlePloS one2026
A lightweight deep learning framework for reliable microscopy-based diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical and zoonotic disease affecting both human and animal health, for which microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained slides remains the diagnostic reference standard despite being time-consuming and operator-dependent. In this study, we developed a lightweight, calibration-aware deep learning framework for automated amastigote detection and slide-level diagnostic probability estimation from microscopy images. A U-Net architecture with a MobileNetV2 encoder was employed for pixel-level parasite segmentation using a weakly supervised pseudo-labeling strategy on a single-center dataset comprising 292 field-of-view images. Slide-level diagnostic probabilities were derived via probability pooling and subsequently refined using post-hoc calibration techniques, including isotonic regression, Platt scaling, and temperature scaling. Model performance was evaluated on an independent test set using segmentation metrics (Dice coefficient and Intersection-over-Union) and diagnostic reliability metrics (AUROC, Brier score, and Expected Calibration Error). The proposed framework achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.901 and an IoU of 0.820 for segmentation against pseudo-label references, with strong discriminative performance at the slide level (AUROC = 0.978). Isotonic regression markedly improved probability reliability, reducing the Brier score from 0.089 to 0.030 and the Expected Calibration Error from 0.120 to 0.023 without significantly affecting discrimination. Statistical analyses confirmed the robustness of the calibration improvements. Overall, the results demonstrate that isotonic calibration enhances the interpretability and reliability of deep-learning-based CL diagnostics. The proposed lightweight framework provides a robust foundation for microscopy-based screening and supports future validation across broader datasets and One Health-oriented diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.