Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Enhancing cancer drug discovery: QSAR modeling with machine learning and chemical representations.

Raúl Acosta-Murillo, José Carlos Ortiz-Bayliss, Patricio Adrian Zapata-Morin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raúl Acosta-MurilloDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Pedro de Alba SN, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
José Carlos Ortiz-BaylissTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Eugenio Garza Sada, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Patricio Adrian Zapata-MorinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Pedro de Alba SN, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-2293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting the bioactivity of small molecules against cancer therapeutic targets remains a significant challenge at the intersection of cheminformatics and drug discovery. This study comprehensively evaluates chemical representations, including AtomPair Counts (APC),Avalon (AVN), Extended-Connectivity Fingerprint diameter 4 (ECFP4), Extended-Connectivity Fingerprint diameter 6 (ECFP6), Feature-based Morgan 2 (FM2), Feature-based Morgan 3 (FM3), Mol2Vec (M2V), Molecular ACCess System (MACCS), Mordred 2D Chi Kappa (MK2), RDKFingerprint (RDF), Rdkit PhysChem (RDC), Torsion (TSN) combined with machine learning algorithms (Bayesian Ridge (BRG), Elastic Net (ENT), Extra Trees (ETT), Hist Gradient Boosting (HGT), K-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Lasso (LSS), Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), Partial least squares (PLS), Random Forest (RFT), Ridge (RDG), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), and XGBoost (XGB)) for predicting cancer bioactivities. The results show that while AVN chemical representation, in conjunction with SVR algorithm, achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with R2 of 0.735 in FGFR1 dataset; The mTOR dataset demonstrated the highest average performance across all models and chemical representations, with an R2 of 0.592 across various cancer datasets. These findings demonstrate how cheminformatics tools like molecular fingerprints and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling can significantly enhance bioactivity prediction, ultimately contributing to more efficient and targeted cancer drug discovery.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningNeoplasmsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID41843628
PMCPMC12994839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.