ArticlePloS one2026
Explaining urban street perception inequities between residents and tourists using interpretable machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how different social groups perceive urban streets is essential for inclusive and sustainable urban design. This study proposes an interpretable and scalable machine learning framework that integrates Street View Images with subjective evaluations to examine perceptual differences between residents and tourists. Using data from Xi'an's historic Mingcheng District, we collected perception ratings across five dimensions-safety, comfort, convenience, pleasure, and sociability-and analyzed how visual and environmental features shape these perceptions. The framework combines predictive modeling and explainable analysis to uncover both linear and nonlinear drivers of perception. The results show that tourists are more responsive to symbolic and aesthetic cues, while residents emphasize functional and comfort-related features. Key visual elements such as vegetation, building facades, and spatial openness exert different effects on the two groups. By revealing these perceptual disparities, the study provides actionable insights for perception-informed and equitable street design strategies that better address the needs of diverse urban users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.