Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843578›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2026

Simplifying causal gene identification in GWAS loci.

Marijn Schipper, Jacob Ulirsch, Danielle Posthuma, Stephan Ripke, Karl Heilbron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marijn SchipperDepartment of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacob UlirschProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Danielle PosthumaDepartment of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephan RipkeStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Karl HeilbronStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-1723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) help to identify disease-linked genetic variants, but pinpointing the most likely causal genes in GWAS loci remains challenging. Existing GWAS gene prioritization tools are powerful but often use complex black box models trained on datasets containing biases. Here, we used a data-driven approach to construct a truth set of causal genes in 200 GWAS loci. We found that a simple logistic regression model performed as well as a more complex XGBoost model, and that many commonly-used gene prioritization features could be removed without meaningfully affecting performance (e.g., expression quantitative trait locus colocalization and Mendelian randomization). We present CALDERA, a gene prioritization tool that uses a logistic regression model and uses just four input features. In independent benchmarking datasets of resolved GWAS loci, CALDERA achieved state-of-the-art performance in comparison with other methods (FLAMES, L2G, and cS2G). CALDERA outputs causal gene probabilities for all genes in a given GWAS locus and we show that these probabilities are well-calibrated. Applying CALDERA to 93 UK Biobank traits, we predicted 11,956 putative causal genes, potentially resolving up to 52% of loci. Overall, CALDERA provides a powerful solution for prioritizing potentially causal genes in GWAS loci that minimizes the data processing required to construct input features and generates an easily-interpretable output score.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLogistic ModelsModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID41843578
PMCPMC13012518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.