ArticlePsychology and aging2026
Aging and memory for temporal order in naturalistic events.
Article in Psychology and aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aging and memory for temporal order in naturalistic events.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memory for temporal order is traditionally viewed as a type of associative memory that declines with age. However, most of our understanding of age-related change in retrieving specific temporal associations comes from studies that examine the memory of simple, arbitrary lists of items. Relatively less is known about how the learning and retrieval of naturalistic narratives change with age. Narratives are of interest because they incorporate temporal structure characteristic of everyday experience and because their comprehension depends on semantic background knowledge. In this study, younger and older adults read narratives with a two-level hierarchical structure in which fine-grained subevents were nested within larger coarse-grained events. For some narratives, semantic knowledge could be informative about the order of coarse-grained events; for other narratives, knowledge could be informative about the order of fine-grained subevents. After reading, participants completed tests of memory for temporal order and temporal distance. Both younger and older adults took advantage of semantic knowledge about coarse-grained or fine-grained temporal structure to better remember event order, with older adults exhibiting greater knowledge-related benefits. Both groups also remembered pairs of fine-grained events as farther apart when they spanned a coarse-grained event boundary, indicating preserved event-based organization in memory across age. When making metamemory judgments, older adults' confidence ratings were more liberal and less sensitive to their actual memory performance than those of younger adults. Together, these results suggest that the ability to use knowledge about the typical temporal structure of activity to remember specific event sequences is robust across the adult lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.