Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843481›Full record

ArticlePsychology and aging2026

Aging and memory for temporal order in naturalistic events.

Yining Ding, Devon R Alperin, Jeffrey M Zacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yining DingDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0002-4116-8497
Devon R AlperinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0009-0001-9312-3696
Jeffrey M ZacksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-3690

Funding

AGING AND DEVELOPMENTT32AG000030 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENISE HEAD, Jeffrey M Zacks · 1985 to 2026
$9.7M
IMPROVING EVERYDAY MEMORY IN HEALTHY AGING AND EARLY ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER01AG062438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZACKS, JEFFREY M · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
National Institutes of Health; National Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS R01 AG062438NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000030Washington University; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory for temporal order is traditionally viewed as a type of associative memory that declines with age. However, most of our understanding of age-related change in retrieving specific temporal associations comes from studies that examine the memory of simple, arbitrary lists of items. Relatively less is known about how the learning and retrieval of naturalistic narratives change with age. Narratives are of interest because they incorporate temporal structure characteristic of everyday experience and because their comprehension depends on semantic background knowledge. In this study, younger and older adults read narratives with a two-level hierarchical structure in which fine-grained subevents were nested within larger coarse-grained events. For some narratives, semantic knowledge could be informative about the order of coarse-grained events; for other narratives, knowledge could be informative about the order of fine-grained subevents. After reading, participants completed tests of memory for temporal order and temporal distance. Both younger and older adults took advantage of semantic knowledge about coarse-grained or fine-grained temporal structure to better remember event order, with older adults exhibiting greater knowledge-related benefits. Both groups also remembered pairs of fine-grained events as farther apart when they spanned a coarse-grained event boundary, indicating preserved event-based organization in memory across age. When making metamemory judgments, older adults' confidence ratings were more liberal and less sensitive to their actual memory performance than those of younger adults. Together, these results suggest that the ability to use knowledge about the typical temporal structure of activity to remember specific event sequences is robust across the adult lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiers

PMID41843481
PMCPMC13002118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.