Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843461›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026

Movement enhances tactile sensitivity through prediction.

Pierangelo Nicolas D'Onofrio Pacheco, Eckart Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierangelo Nicolas D'Onofrio PachecoInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-2756-1359
Eckart ZimmermannInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) ERC Consolidator Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tactile sensations decrease in felt intensity during movement, a phenomenon known as sensory gating. Competing theories attempt to explain why somatosensory perception is down-weighted during motion. We investigated how motor execution and prediction shape tactile sensations by precisely matching kinematics between active and passive movements. Perceived intensity was reduced in both conditions, but tactile sensitivity was enhanced rather than impaired during active movement compared with passive movement at matched kinematics. When passive movement velocity was predictable, sensitivity increased to the level of active movement, whereas temporal unpredictability impaired precision without affecting bias. These results show that predictions about imminent kinematics intrinsic to self-generated actions or learned during predictable passive motion sharpen tactile discrimination, whereas a separate movement-related process reduces perceived intensity. Our results reveal that movement does not globally suppress tactile processing but differentially affects bias and precision: perceived intensity decreases, whereas tactile discrimination improves when upcoming kinematics are predictable.

Indexed as

Sensory GatingTouch PerceptionAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMovementTouchYoung Adultmovement predictabilitypassive and active movementsensory gatingsomatosensory processingtactile discrimination

Identifiers

PMID41843461
PMCPMC7619185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.