ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Colorectal Micropapillary Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal micropapillary adenocarcinoma (CMPA) is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of colorectal cancer with high metastatic potential and the proportion of CMPA to the entire tumor ranged from 5 to 80% but was usually less than 30% of the entire lesion. Its distinctive histological features and molecular mechanisms have rendered it a subject of current research. CMPA is characterized by the arrangement of micropapillary structures, which is frequently associated with high invasiveness of lymphatic and blood vessels, thereby significantly increasing the risk of metastasis to lymph nodes and distant organs. At the molecular level, mutations in genes such as KRAS, BRAF, and TP53 enhance tumor invasiveness by modulating signaling pathways and promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment(TME) of CMPA exhibits a higher mesenchymal component and a lower content of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which is strongly associated with poor patient prognosis. During the diagnostic process, immunohistochemical markers such as CK20, CDX2, and TP53 play a crucial role in the identification and classification of CMPA. At present, surgical resection remains the primary treatment for CMPA. However, its high recurrence rate and propensity to metastasize indicate the necessity for further research into more effective targeted and immunotherapeutic options. Future studies should focus on the molecular mechanisms, immune microenvironmental properties, and individualized treatment strategies for CMPA, with the objective of improving clinical outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.