ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026
China's "greening but weakening" protected areas reveal a global conservation quality-quantity dilemma.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protected areas play a crucial role in global biodiversity conservation, yet they are increasingly threatened by climate change and human activities. Traditional assessments that focus exclusively on vegetation productivity (vigor) fail to capture essential dimensions of ecosystem health, such as biodiversity structure (organization) and adaptive capacity (resilience). Here, we propose a comprehensive vigor-organization-resilience framework that integrates remote sensing, machine learning, and field data to evaluate ecosystem health across 431 Chinese National Nature Reserves from 1990 to 2020. Our findings reveal that while 60.3% of reserves maintained healthy ecosystems, particularly forests, which outperformed grasslands, we identified a concerning "greening but weakening" paradox. Specifically, vegetation vigor increased by 29.4%, yet ecosystem resilience declined significantly by 26.8%, and organizational integrity decreased moderately by 6.1%. Notably, grasslands exhibited an increase in organizational structure (+7.4%), whereas forests experienced a decline (-9.9%), indicating biome-specific stress responses. Furthermore, the gap in ecosystem health between protected and adjacent non-protected areas narrowed from 3.7% to 1.8%, with measurable spillover effects contributing to an overall improvement in external ecosystem health (+2.8%). Topography, soil properties, and management practices accounted for 60% of the spatial variability in ecosystem health, while climate variability and disturbances were responsible for 51% of the temporal changes observed. By quantifying these decoupled dimensions of ecosystem health, our approach facilitates targeted conservation interventions that are essential for achieving functional, rather than merely area-based, outcomes in line with the Global Biodiversity Framework's 30×30 initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.