ReviewJournal of prevention (2022)2026
What Do We Know About Proximal Factors Influencing Bystander Intervention? A Call for Momentary Assessment and Intervention.
Review in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bystander intervention (BI) is among the most extensively studied phenomena in social psychology, with theoretical models underscoring a range of situational factors that influence helping behavior. Yet, despite considerable attention and emphasis placed on understanding these processes, we know very little about momentary and dynamic factors that effect actual BI in real-time. This is especially problematic because BI prevention programs are designed to promote in-the-moment behavioral responses to emergent risk, yet the evidence base supporting their use relies predominantly on cross-sectional retrospective self-reports, intervention-likelihood paradigms, and other proxy outcomes with limited external and ecological validity. Due to longstanding methodological constraints, our collective knowledge of how proximal and situational factors directly influence real-world BI behavior remains limited, yet understanding how event-level influences such as acute alcohol intoxication impact BI is essential for creating effective sexual violence prevention programming. In this debate paper, we synthesize the current literature on proximal influences of BI and propose a framework to guide future research using ecologically valid, real-time momentary assessment methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.