Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843318›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Robotic management of Morgagni hernias: a case series from a specialized hernia center.

David Koza, Carlos Balthazar da Silveira, Kyle Leong DO, Ana Rasador, Vikram Deka, Thomas Gillespie, Conrad Ballecer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David KozaCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Carlos Balthazar da SilveiraCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA. carlos.balthazardasilveira@commonspirit.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-0620
Kyle Leong DOCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ana RasadorDignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Vikram DekaCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Thomas GillespieCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Conrad BallecerCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMorgagni hernias, a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, are typically asymptomatic and often diagnosed incidentally in adulthood. Despite their infrequent occurrence, surgical intervention is required in symptomatic cases or when complications arise. Traditionally, Morgagni hernias are managed through open surgery. However, recent advancements in robotic surgery offer potential benefits, including enhanced precision, reduced recovery times, and improved outcomes. This case series aims to explore the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of robotic-assisted repair of Morgagni hernias at a specialized hernia center.

methodsMedical records from all the patients who underwent ventral and Morgagni hernia repair were reviewed from December 2019 to December 2023. Patients with a surgical or radiological diagnosis of Morgagni hernias who underwent robotic repair were included for analysis. The protocol at our institute involves preoperative optimization, and myofascial release may be indicated for complex Morgagni defects associated with midline incisional hernias, while isolated Morgagni hernias are typically repaired by a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. Additionally, robotic repair has become the standard approach at our institution. Outcomes included patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, robotic surgical techniques, defect measurements, concomitant procedures, hospital length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Complications analyzed comprised immediate postoperative and chronic pain, surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), readmission and reoperation, recurrence.

resultsA total of 7 patients were identified through records review. The median age was 60 (IQR 53–71) years, and the sample was comprised by 5 (71.4%) females and 2 (28.6%) males. Median body mass index (BMI) was 34.3 kg/m2 (IQR 24.1–38.7). The most common symptom was pain (71.4%), and the majority of the patients presented a history of abdominal or thoracoabdominal surgery (85.7%). The median intraoperative defect length was 8 cm (IQR 6–11) and the median defect width was 4 cm (IQR 4–10). A total of 6 (85.7%) patients presented simultaneous midline incisional hernias, and transversus abdominis release (TAR) was required in 4 (57.1%) patients, while the other 3 (42.9%) patients underwent transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs. Immediate postoperative pain was noted in 3 (42.9%) of the patients, of whom 2 (66.6%) underwent TAR. Also, one (14.3%) patient who underwent TAR presented with a seroma that did not require interventions. Within a median follow-up of 284 days (IQR 50–435), no recurrences or chronic pain were noted. One (14.3%) was deceased 6 months postoperatively due to metastatic pancreatic cancer.

conclusionRobotic repair of Morgagni hernias demonstrates a low complication rate, allowing for precise anatomical dissection and yielding excellent outcomes. However, it is a highly complex procedure that, in most cases, should be performed at specialized centers with expertise in this type of repair to ensure optimal results and patient safety.

Indexed as

Hernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalHerniorrhaphyRobotic Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAbdominal wall surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryMorgagni herniaRobotic surgeryVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.