ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Handwriting Challenges in Autistic Children: A Comparative Study of Legibility and Character Processing in Logographic Chinese Writing.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHandwriting is a crucial skill for school-age children, significantly impacting their academic performance. For autistic children, handwriting can be particularly challenging due to differences in how they process visual information. These children often focus on smaller details rather than seeing the overall shape of letters or characters, a cognitive trait known as Weak Central Coherence (WCC). Despite these challenges, there is still limited research on handwriting legibility and character processing in autistic children within the context of logographic languages.
methodsThis study conducted comparative analyses between 30 autistic children and 30 age-matched peers. The Chinese Handwriting Legibility Assessment for Children was administered to evaluate legibility, while character processing tasks were conducted to assess the impact of WCC on character recognition.
resultsResults indicated that autistic children exhibit poorer legibility in Chinese handwriting, particularly in radical proportion and spacing arrangement. In terms of character processing, both groups performed similarly with familiar characters, but autistic children were influenced by WCC when processing unfamiliar characters. No clear correlation between legibility and WCC was found, potentially due to handwriting legibility being assessed only with familiar characters, but not unfamiliar characters.
conclusionThis study highlights the challenges faced by autistic children in handwriting legibility, particularly in the radical arrangement. While the impact of WCC significantly impacts the processing of unfamiliar characters, it does not notably affect familiar characters, suggesting that familiarity helps mitigate WCC’s influence. Understanding these challenges can inform the development of targeted interventions to support handwriting skills in autistic children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.