ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Efficacy and safety of approved cellular therapies and bispecific antibodies in solid tumors: the current state.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy is a broad term including naked antibodies, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, cancer vaccines, activated immune cells, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Recent advances in immune-engaging T-cell therapies have led to significant progress in novel treatments across various cancer types, resulting in prolonged patient survival, mainly in patients with hematologic malignancies. Several CAR T-cell constructs and BsAbs have been approved by regulatory authorities worldwide for relapsed, refractory leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Solid tumors are characterized by an immunosuppressive, fibroinflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune-suppressive cells, such as regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This, coupled with challenges such as tumor-intrinsic factors (tumor antigen heterogeneity, target antigen loss, hypoxia within the tumor bed, and insufficient preexisting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) and therapy-related hurdles like on-target off-tumor toxicity, impedes the development of durable immune-engaging T-cell therapies across solid tumor types. However, a few BsAbs, TILs, and autologous-engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapies have recently been approved across indications, paving the way for newer horizons in the solid tumor cellular therapy landscape. Here, we review the available data on the efficacy and safety of cellular therapies and BsAbs in solid tumors approved thus far by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These include BsAbs, TILs, and TCR therapy. Given the lack of homogeneous clinical practice guidelines for TCE therapies in solid tumors, we discuss and compare the efficacy and safety of five therapies. We further present the therapeutic pipeline across solid tumors and discuss strategies currently under investigation to optimize T-cell subsets to enhance antitumor efficacy while improving the safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.