ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Development and Characteristics of Sexting from Age 14 to 18 Years in a Norwegian Birth Cohort.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexting, the sending or receiving of sexually explicit texts, images, or videos via technological devices, is common among adolescents. This study examined sexting behaviors in a birth cohort assessed at ages 14, 16, and 18 years (analytical sample: n = 743, 53.7% girls). Results showed receiving sexts was more common than sending them, with frequency increasing with age. Both sending and receiving sexts exhibited significant two-year rank-order stability. Sexting typically occurred on non-anonymous social media platforms (e.g., Snapchat, Instagram), with fewer than 5% using anonymous platforms. Adolescents mostly sent sexts to boyfriends or girlfriends, with the proportion rising from 19% to 27% between ages 16 and 18. At age 14, 19% reported receiving sexts from unknown people, doubling by age 18. The prevalence of sending sexts did not significantly differ between girls and boys, but girls were more likely to receive sexts, especially from unknown individuals and on their own social media platforms. Sex, pubertal status, and biological age did not predict changes in sexting frequency from age 14 to 18. The study highlights the need for interventions and policies that recognize certain types of sexting as part of sexual development while protecting against sexual victimization and associated risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.