ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Comparison of deep and conventional machine learning methods in predicting joint moments in patients with cerebral palsy.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hip, knee, and ankle joint moments during gait are critical for clinical decision-making in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). These moments are typically calculated using inverse dynamics and human body models based on ground reaction forces (GRF). However, obtaining GRF data from CP patients can be challenging. Recent studies suggest joint moments in CP patients can be predicted using joint angles alone, bypassing the need for GRF, through machine learning (ML). However, the optimal type and scope of input data for such models remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the most feasible ML approach based on prediction accuracy for predicting joint moments from gait kinematics in CP patients. Retrospective gait data from 917 CP patients were analysed; after applying inclusion-exclusion criteria, data from 622 CP patients were used. We evaluated four conventional ML algorithms, ridge regression, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and multilayer neural network, using feature-based input, and two deep learning algorithms, one-dimensional convolutional neural network and long short-term memory network, using raw data input, with each model’s hyper-parameters optimized in a problem-specific manner. Models were assessed using normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Deep learning models achieved an average nRMSE of 14.75 ± 7.10 and PCC of 0.95, while conventional ML models yielded 16.03 ± 6.55 and 0.94, indicating both conventional and deep learning approaches showed promise for predicting joint moments in patients with CP. By considering factors such as data availability and computational cost, an appropriate ML method can be selected to effectively address gait kinetics prediction in individuals with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.