ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Neuroendoscopy improves operability and reduces hazardous vermian manipulation during the telovelar approach to the fourth ventricle's floor: an anatomical study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approaching the fourth ventricle’s floor (FVF) is challenging. The transvermian approach (TRVE) provides wide access, but splitting the cerebellar vermis carries the risk of cerebellar mutism syndrome. Alternatively, the telovelar approach (TLV) enables entering the FVF without transecting neural tissue. However, the entrance through the cerebellomedullary fissure is narrow and pronounced microscope tilt or excessive and hazardous vermian retraction may still be required, especially when approaching the most rostral FVF portions. We hypothesize that neuroendoscopy during the TLV may improve operability and reduce vermian manipulation compared with classical microsurgical TLV and transvermian techniques. We also report two illustrative surgical cases (epidermoid cyst and pontine cavernoma) resected via an endoscopy-assisted TLV with favourable outcomes. We performed a within-subject comparison of operability scores and vermian retraction requirements between neuroendoscopic TLV (TLV_Endo), TRVE, and classical microsurgical TLV (TLV_Micro) when approaching the FVF in 8 formalin-fixed heads. At equal vermian retraction levels (0, 5, and 10 mm), TLV_Endo enabled significantly higher operability scores than TLV_Micro, especially along the middle and superior ventricular portions (p < 0.01), reaching even comparable scores to those obtained with the TRVE. Significantly lower vermian retraction was needed during TLV_Endo to achieve maximal operability scores along the middle (p < 0.01) and superior (p < 0.001) portions of the FVF versus TLV_Micro. In both illustrative cases, endoscopy-assisted TLV enabled safe lesion resection with good postoperative outcomes. TLV_Endo facilitates surgery along the FVF, particularly in its middle and superior portions, while minimizing vermian manipulation and potentially neurocognitive risks associated with vermian injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.