ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Associations Between Social Insurance Literacy and Perceived Justice and Perceived Fairness in a Work Disability Claim Setting.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSuccessful completion of processes within the social insurance system depends on both individual characteristics of work disability applicants and structural characteristics of the system itself. The interaction between individuals' knowledge and abilities and the comprehensibility of the system constitutes what is referred to as social insurance literacy (SIL). Limited SIL may lead to feelings of injustice or unfairness. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between SIL and perceived justice and fairness among clients applying for work disability benefits.
methodsA cross-sectional survey study was conducted among clients applying for work disability benefits within the Dutch social insurance system. Data were collected on the four domains of SIL (individuals' ability to obtain; to understand; to act; and system comprehensibility), and on perceived justice and perceived fairness. Associations were analyzed using multivariable linear regression.
resultsA total of 168 respondents were included in the sample. Of the four SIL domains, clients' self-reported ability to act on information was significantly associated with perceived justice [B = 0.26, SE = 0.12]. In addition, system comprehensibility was significantly associated with both fairness [B = 0.57, SE = 0.08] and justice [B = 0.72, SE = 0.09]. No significant associations were found for the domains related to the ability to obtain or understand information.
conclusionSystem comprehensibility was more strongly associated with perceived justice and fairness than clients' individual abilities to obtain, understand, or act on information. Improving the clarity and accessibility of information provided by the system may be an effective strategy to enhance clients' perceptions of justice and fairness when applying for work disability benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.