Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
The impact of integrative medicine on quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and cancer.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01860365 (Measuring Concerns and Needs of Cancer Patients Referred to Complementary Medicine Treatment Integrated Within the Oncology Service), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Measuring Concerns and Needs of Cancer Patients Referred to Complementary Medicine Treatment Integrated Within the Oncology Service
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative oncology: evolution, framework, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntegrative complementary medicine (ICM) combines complementary therapies with conventional supportive and palliative care to address quality of life (QoL). Diabetes mellitus (DM) is prevalent among patients with cancer and has been associated with worse health-related QoL. We examined the impact of an ICM program on QoL-related concerns among patients being treated for cancer, with vs. without DM.
methodsThis prospective, controlled and pragmatic study examined a 6-week ICM program, comparing DM to non-DM patients using the ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) tools. The threshold for statistical significance was established at a P-value of less than 0.05.
resultsOf 671 patients, 135 (20%) had DM, with similar baseline QoL-related concerns (pain, fatigue, gastrointestinal and emotional concerns) in both groups. DM patients (vs. non-DM) responded significantly less on drowsiness on ESAS (P = 0.047); and emotional functioning on EORTC (P = 0.017). Compared to baseline, the non-DM group showed significant improvement in fatigue and sleep quality (on ESAS and EORTC; P < 0.001), while the DM group did not show any improvement for these concerns.
conclusionPatients with cancer and DM showed a less significant response to ICM treatments when compared to non-DM patients, emphasizing the need for identifying this sub-population of patients while creating specialized ICM programs tailored to their needs. Future research should focus on exploring the impact of ICM programs on patients with both DM and cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01860365, 2013-05-21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.