ArticleNeurogenetics2026
Thorough evaluation of a novel splice variant in a female patient with MED12-related intellectual disability.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) functions as a member of a multiprotein complex to regulate the fundamental process of transcription activation and repression. MED12-related disorders include X-linked syndromes and nonspecific intellectual disability, which display complex and gender-specific genotype-phenotype relationships. This study aimed to evaluate a novel splice variant in a female patient with MED12-related nonspecific intellectual disability. DNA sequencing identified the heterozygous intronic variant in the MED12 gene, NM_005120.3:c.397-12A > G. Bioinformatic analysis suggested a damaging effect, and subsequent transcriptome sequencing and individual transcript analysis confirmed aberrant splicing, including Exon 4 skipping and an 11 bp insertion from Intron 3. X-chromosome inactivation analysis revealed a moderately skewed pattern, consistent with reduced MED12 expression. More importantly, using in vitro minigene assays, we directly proved that this variant leads to the production of both abnormal transcripts and a remaining amount of normal ones, contributing to relatively mild disease symptoms in our patient. Collectively, our findings support the pathogenicity of this identified variant, which is classified as pathogenic per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, and diagnose the patient with MED12-related nonspecific intellectual disability. This study highlights the importance of integrating multiple molecular biology tools to diagnose and understand MED12-related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.