Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843196›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2026

Integrated approaches for lameness control in free-stall dairy systems under heat stress and water scarcity.

Nadia Hamdi Fahim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nadia Hamdi FahimAnimal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. nadiaamn@agr.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-2338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lameness remains a critical welfare and productivity issue in dairy cattle, now intensified by climate-driven stressors such as heat stress and water scarcity. While each stressor has been widely studied individually, their combined and synergistic impacts on lameness risk are insufficiently characterized. This review synthesizes current evidence on the physiological, behavioral, and environmental pathways connecting these stressors to hoof health deterioration. It further inspects advances in sensor technologies and machine learning models. These models are capable of detecting and predicting lameness, heat stress, and water scarcity within integrated, multi-stressor monitoring frameworks. A comparative analysis was conducted for algorithms, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, and deep learning-based pose assessment. The analysis revealed notable methodological and sensor overlap, allowing cross-application of validated models between domains. Such integration offers gains in cost-efficiency, data infrastructure use, and scalability, supporting the development of adaptable early-warning systems for precision livestock farming. However, regional climatic variability and infrastructure barriers still pose obstacles to adoption. There is a need for locally adapted thresholds, farmer training, and sustainable implementation strategies. By integrating climate-resilient housing, nutritional optimization, and AI-driven monitoring, dairy systems can transition toward anticipatory, resource-efficient management. This transition enhances welfare, alleviates lameness risk, and improves robustness under escalating environmental variability.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesDairyingHeat Stress DisordersLameness, AnimalAnimalsCattleFemaleHot TemperatureDairy cattleHeat stressLamenessMachine learningSensorsWater scarcity

Identifiers

PMID41843196
PMCPMC12996382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.