Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843171›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2026

Investigating the impact of migraine on short-term and working memory: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kenya McKay, Kate Kelly

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenya McKayDepartment of Psychology, Counselling and Therapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kate KellySchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Kate.kelly@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-2009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on past research to ascertain the impact that experiencing migraines has on memory. Specifically, this research explores the short-term and working memory domains and where possible delineates between verbal and visual memory.

backgroundMigraine is a prevalent neurological disorder that affects up to 15% of the global population. Migraine is comprised of physical symptoms including head pain, nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and sound. There are also various subtypes that are based on specific symptom manifestations such as the presence of visual aura. Furthermore, a commonly reported cognitive symptom is 'brain fog', a colloquial term used to describe everyday cognitive challenges particularly in relation to attention and memory. The empirical literature examining memory performance in migraine has produced inconsistent findings: some studies report clear cognitive impairment, whereas others suggest minimal or no deficits. In addition, research to date has been limited in its examination of specific memory domains and has not consistently considered the influence of migraine characteristics. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the short-term and working memory performance of migraineurs compared to healthy controls. Subsidiary aims included investigating the memory performance of migraineurs with aura and without aura and investigating the impact of migraine on visual and verbal memory performance.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. Papers were screened in two stages (titles and abstracts and full texts) using inclusion criteria relevant to the aims. Of 3880 articles extracted, 16 met the criteria for inclusion. Random effects models were conducted in JASP and utilised Hedge's g as the effect size. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q and I

resultsNo significant differences were found between migraineurs and healthy controls in short-term memory performance. Specifically, no significant differences were observed between migraineurs with aura and healthy controls, migraineurs without aura and healthy controls, or migraineurs with and without aura. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in short-term visual or verbal memory performance. In contrast, a significant difference was observed in working memory performance, with migraineurs demonstrating poorer performance relative to healthy controls.

conclusionsThe findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that short-term memory performance is preserved in adults with migraine, whereas working memory shows a selective impairment. This pattern suggests that migraine is not associated with a global memory deficit, but rather with vulnerability in higher-order memory processes requiring active manipulation and cognitive control. These results help reconcile objective cognitive findings with commonly reported experiences of brain fog and suggest that migraine-related cognitive complaints may reflect difficulties in cognitive efficiency rather than fundamental memory storage deficits during the interictal period. TRIAL REGISTRATION POLICY: There was no registration as this paper is not experimental.

Indexed as

Memory DisordersMemory, Short-TermMigraine DisordersHumansCognitive functionMeta-analysisMigraineShort-term memorySystematic reviewWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41843171
PMCPMC12995983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.