ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Learning gain of an ATLS
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTeam performance in polytrauma management determines patient outcome and is crucially shaped by Crew Resource Management (CRM). This study explored patterns of self-perceived learning following an interdisciplinary, interprofessional, in-situ, simulation- and ATLS®-based trauma team training with a focus on CRM principles.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of routine educational data collected immediately after 36 training sessions (03/2022–11/2023) including 238 participants at a single Level I trauma center. Participants completed a retrospective pre-test/post-test self-assessment questionnaire. Exploratory analysis, including EFA, were used to descriptively structure self-perceived learning patterns and subgroup differences.
resultsParticipants came from anesthesiology, surgery and radiology in equal proportions and differed in working experience, professional role, and exposure to polytrauma management. Exploratory factor analysis identified three descriptive dimensions of self-assessed CRM-related concepts: (i) personal operational competence, (ii) team communication, and (iii) decision making. Patterns of self-perceived change varied by experience level, with larger reported gains in personal operational competence among less experienced participants.
conclusionThis exploratory analysis describes patterns of self-perceived learning following in-situ trauma team simulation training. The findings should be interpreted as subjective learning perceptions at Kirkpatrick level 2 rather than evidence of long-term behavioral change. Self-perceived CRM-related competencies were enhanced in all professions and subspecialties, regardless of prior experience or trauma exposure. Future longitudinal and objective assessments are needed to evaluate transfer to practice and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.