ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships in patients with symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis - PREFLOW.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionManagement of aortic stenosis, particularly with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and discordant or borderline echocardiographic findings, remains challenging, both in assessing the true severity of stenosis and in isolating the valvular contribution to symptoms amidst comorbid conditions. This study evaluates the feasibility and physiological insight obtained from invasive pressure measurements across the aortic valve at rest and during exercise in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study included patients with symptomatic high-gradient severe, low-gradient severe, and moderate aortic stenosis. They underwent invasive pressure gradient measurements across the aortic valve (pressure catheters in the left ventricle and ascending aorta) with concurrent right heart catheterization at rest and during peak supine bicycle exercise.
resultsOf 28 patients included, invasive measurements during exercise were feasible in 25 patients. Overall, exercise induced increases in aortic valve gradient, flow, and opening area, but there was considerable heterogeneity in individual hemodynamic responses. Notably, of the 14 patients in the low-gradient severe group based on echocardiography, nine demonstrated divergent physiological responses consistent with either moderate or high-gradient severe during exercise. All patients - irrespective of stenosis severity - had differential causes of symptoms during exercise with at least one of the following: chronotropic incompetence, abnormal increase in pulmonary artery or left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, or peripheral impairment of oxygen extraction or utilization.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate the safety and feasibility of invasive hemodynamic exercise testing in patients with aortic stenosis and highlight heterogeneity in pressure-flow responses during exercise. Invasive hemodynamic assessment during exercise may help elucidate alternative contributing mechanisms to exertional dyspnea, particularly in patients with aortic stenosis and discordant symptoms and findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.