ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Performance of Kawasaki Disease Risk Scores in a 30-Year Regional Spanish Cohort.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several risk scores have been developed to predict intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) resistance and coronary artery involvement in Kawasaki disease (KD), but their performance outside Asian populations remains uncertain. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of major KD risk scores in predicting IVIG resistance and coronary artery involvement in a regional cohort from Northern Spain. Retrospective observational study including 81 KD patients diagnosed at a tertiary pediatric center (1994–2024). We applied the following IVIG-resistance scores: Kobayashi, Egami, Sano, Kawanet, Kawanet-echo, Kawa-Race, and the Spanish Pediatric Association (AEP) consensus. For coronary involvement prediction, the Son score and the Kawa-Race coronary score were used. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated, restricting IVIG-resistance analyses to patients who received IVIG as initial therapy. An exploratory stratified analysis according to therapeutic era (pre-2017 vs. ≥ 2017), reflecting the progressive introduction of adjunctive corticosteroids, was performed. IVIG resistance occurred in 7/81 (8.6%) and coronary artery involvement (dilatation or aneurysm) in 23/81 (28.4%). Most IVIG-resistance scores showed low sensitivity but high negative predictive value, while the AEP criteria achieved maximal sensitivity at the expense of very low specificity. Coronary involvement frequently occurred in IVIG-responsive patients (20/23, 87.0%). For coronary prediction, the Son score at the ≥ 2-point threshold showed the most balanced performance (sensitivity 34.8%, specificity 93.1%), whereas the Kawa-Race coronary score demonstrated high specificity (94.8%) but very low sensitivity (13.0%). Stratified analysis by therapeutic era showed persistently low positive predictive values and heterogeneous sensitivity across IVIG-resistance scores, with no clear improvement in discriminative performance after the introduction of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy. KD risk scores showed limited sensitivity for identifying children at risk of coronary artery involvement in this Western cohort and this limited performance remained consistent across therapeutic eras, including after the progressive introduction of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy. The marked discordance between IVIG resistance and coronary outcomes suggests that refractoriness-based prediction alone may be insufficient to guide early treatment intensification. A sequential strategy integrating early clinical assessment with coronary-focused prediction tools may support individualized management. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.