ArticleUrolithiasis2026
The anatomy of a jackstone: a novel morphometric analysis of a rare urinary calculus.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concurrent Jackstone Calculus and Prostate Cancer: Should They Be Treated Concurrently or Sequentially?American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Jackstone calculi are rare urinary stones characterized by multiple spiculated arms, yet the mechanisms underlying their distinctive morphology remain incompletely understood, in part due to the challenge of quantifying microstructural growth patterns along their complex three-dimensional geometry. In this study, we applied a non-destructive micro-computed tomography morphometric method to analyze a jackstone retrieved from the bladder of a human donor. This approach enabled measurement of incremental layering along individual arms and branches. We hypothesized that distal arm regions would show evidence of more rapid remodeling than proximal regions. Consistent with this hypothesis, six of seven arms and four of six branches demonstrated greater layer number and decreased layer thickness toward their distal tips, supporting an abrasion-mediated remodeling model of jackstone growth. The donor also exhibited marked prostate enlargement and bladder wall hypertrophy, suggesting chronic urinary stasis as the physiological setting that permitted stone retention and arm development. These findings refine existing conceptual models by indicating that abrasion influences layer remodeling frequency rather than increasing protein layer thickness. The imaging and analytic workflow described here provides a reproducible framework for future structural, biochemical, and microbial investigations into jackstone pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.