ArticleEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2026
Detection of dermatophytes, Candida spp., and molds by the EuroArray Dermatomycosis® microarray versus fungal culture in patients with suspected dermatomycosis.
Article in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Superficial Mycoses: A Scoping Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Highly sensitive molecular assays have become standard in most microbiology laboratories for the detection of a large variety of pathogens. For dermatophytes, however, fungal culture is often still pursued as the routine method although it requires weeks before results are available. We were interested in whether dermatology patients might benefit from the performance of a commercially available microarray that detects 23 dermatophytes, three yeasts, and three molds.We consecutively examined 49 skin specimens and 52 nail samples from 99 outpatients by both microarray and culture for the detection of fungi. The array detected dermatophytes and yeasts in skin and nail samples significantly more often than culture, and most culture-negative, array-positive patients returning after antifungal therapy showed clinical improvement. Three cultures yielded growth of environmental fungi not included in the array. In order to explain these discrepancies, fluorescence intensities of the microarray spots were analyzed. Fluorescence intensities for dermatophytes were significantly higher than those for molds; data were comparable, however, for culture-positive and culture-negative samples.In conclusion, the microarray investigated constitutes a valuable and sensitive tool in the laboratory diagnosis of dermatomycoses. Rapid, molecular assays for the detection of dermatophytes should be introduced in routine laboratory procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.