ArticleJAMA network open2026
Incidence and Outcomes of Candida Bloodstream Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Current data on Candida bloodstream infection (candidemia) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are constrained by small sample sizes. Further research may inform targeted prevention strategies for early intervention. Objective: To determine the incidence and outcomes of candidemia in SOTRs. Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based cohort study using a provincewide mycology laboratory dataset of patients aged 18 or more years from Ontario, Canada, who received an organ allograft between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2022, with follow-up through December 31, 2023, and linked to administrative health care data. Exposure: Organ transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was candidemia incidence, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences across SOTRs evaluated via the log-rank test. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality, evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with candidemia as a time-dependent variable. Analyses were adjusted for relevant covariates. Results: This study included 10 249 SOTRs (median age, 57 [IQR, 46-64] years; 63.9% male), with kidney transplants representing the majority (59.8%). Candidemia occurred in 135 patients, with Candida albicans as the most frequent species (41.5%), followed by Nakaseomyces (Candida) glabrata (28.1%) and C parapsilosis (11.9%). The cumulative probability of candidemia was 0.87% (95% CI, 0.69%-1.05%) at 1 year, 1.33% (95% CI, 1.09%-1.57%) at 5 years, and 1.67% (95% CI, 1.34%-2.00%) at 10 years. Lung transplant recipients had the highest 10-year cumulative probability at 4.17% (95% CI, 2.96%-5.39%; log-rank P < .001). Median time to candidemia was 34 (IQR, 18.5-354) days in recipients of thoracic allografts and 174 (IQR, 20-836) days in recipients of abdominal allografts. Thirty-day mortality was 39.3% (53 of 135) and 90-day mortality was 47.4% (64 of 135) in patients with candidemia. Candidemia was associated with an increase in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 6.85; 95% CI, 5.59-8.39; P < .001). Fluconazole-susceptible isolates were associated with an increase in mortality (AHR, 8.45; 95% CI, 6.42-11.14; P < .001) as were fluconazole-resistant Candida isolates (AHR, 11.86; 95% CI, 6.13-22.93; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of SOTRs, candidemia was an uncommon complication after organ transplant, with lung transplant recipients at the highest risk. Candidemia was associated with increased mortality. Further research is needed to better identify vulnerable subpopulations and to develop targeted strategies for early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.