ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2026
Beyond the protocol: integrating trauma-informed principles in clinical research with Intensive Care Unit survivors.
Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trauma-informed care (TIC) is an important and influential construct being increasingly used in clinical contexts. The principles of TIC shape the way physicians, nurses, social workers, and other healthcare providers interact with patients, leading to better outcomes, yet TIC constructs are rarely used to shape and influence the conduct of clinical research-whether in medicine generally or, more specially, with intensive care unit (ICU) patients and survivors, an often heavily traumatized group who are the focus of this review. Relying on case studies and relevant patient vignettes, this paper argues for the broad implementation of TIC principles in ICU outcomes research to uphold principles such as beneficence, to minimize potential trauma, and to better honor the unique challenges of a large, growing, and often vulnerable population. ICU experiences often involve fear, terror, loss of control, and vulnerability, which can lead to lasting psychological impacts. For ICU survivors, the process of participating in research may inadvertently re-traumatize them through various pathways, including the informed consent process, potentially distressing questions, and the environment in which patients are seen, to name a few. This paper emphasizes critical factors such as safety, trust, and privacy in shaping patients' research participation, while outlining six key TIC principles: safety, trustworthiness and transparency, peer support, collaboration and mutuality, cultural considerations, and empowerment. By integrating these principles into clinical research practices, investigators can enhance participant welfare, reduce attrition, and improve data quality leading to better and more accurate outcomes and, most importantly, honor the humanity of participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.