Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41842695›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2026

Specification of frequency criteria for secondary findings genes to improve variant classification concordance.

Jennifer J Johnston, Kristy Lee, Deborah I Ritter, Steven M Harrison, Leslie G Biesecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer J JohnstonCenter for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: jjohnsto@nih.gov.
Kristy LeeDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Deborah I RitterDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Steven M HarrisonAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Leslie G BieseckerCenter for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

Baylor College of Medicine/Stanford University Clinical Genome Resource (CLINGEN)U24HG009649 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI TERI Ellen KLEIN, Aleksandar Milosavljevic · 2021 to 2026
$31.5M
The Clinical Genome Resource – Advancing genomic medicine through biocuration and expert assessment of genes and variants at scaleU24HG009650 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONATHAN S BERG, Jessica Ezzell Hunter · 2021 to 2026
$30.0M
ClinGen AI Data Delivery SupplementU24HG006834 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Marina DiStefano, CHRISTA LESE MARTIN · 2021 to 2026
$26.7M
Genomic Ascertainment - Molecular and Genetic AspectsZIAHG200359 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2009 to 2025
$19.7M
Rare & Mosaic Disorders - Clinical ResearchZIAHG200388 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200359Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200388NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG006834NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG009649NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG009650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe return of secondary findings is well established in clinical testing and is increasingly used in clinical research testing. Variant classification can be challenging because of the lack of monogenic disease entity (MDE, defined as a gene-phenotype pair)-specific variant classification recommendations. A key criterion for variant classification is disease allele frequency thresholds (DAFTs), which are not established for all MDEs recommended for the return of secondary findings.

methodsWe calculated DAFTs for secondary finding MDEs considering prevalence, gene contribution, and penetrance. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criterion BS1 was set at the calculated DAFT value, with BA1 set at 10 times the calculated DAFT. For genes associated with multiple secondary finding MDEs without clear genotype-phenotype correlation, DAFT values were combined. GnomAD Grpmax filtering allele frequencies for pathogenic/likely pathogenic classified variants were compared with calculated thresholds.

resultsWe determined BS1 and BA1 values for 58 secondary findings MDEs (47 genes). No pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant Grpmax filtering allele frequency was greater than the relevant MDE-specific BA1.

conclusionSetting BA1 and BS1 thresholds should improve variant classification consistency and reduce misclassifications. For secondary finding MDEs without current ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel specifications, these frequency specifications can be used until full criteria are available.

Indexed as

DiseaseGene FrequencyGenetics, MedicalGenetic VariationSequence Analysis, DNAGenome, HumanGuidelines as TopicHumansPhenotypeACMG criteriaBA1/BS1/DAFTSecondary findings

Identifiers

PMID41842695
PMCPMC13170090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.