ReviewActa orthopaedica2026
An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Treatment of adult patients with a humeral shaft fracture.
Review in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This educational review outlines the core principles of humeral shaft fracture (HSF) management and is designed for orthopedic trainees, general orthopedic surgeons, emergency physicians, and allied health professionals who participate in the acute or postoperative care of patients with HSFs. The content integrates the authors' expert opinion with the current evidence. Humeral shaft fractures account for 1-3% of adult fractures, most often resulting from low-energy falls in older adults or high-energy trauma in younger patients. Although open fractures and neurovascular injuries are rare, primary radial nerve palsy (RNP) occurs in about 10% of cases. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical evaluation and standard radiographs, with CT or MRI reserved for complex or pathological cases. Functional bracing has traditionally been the mainstay of nonsurgical treatment, achieving good long-term results but with nonunion rates up to 25%. Surgical fixation methods-including open reduction and internal fixation, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, and intramedullary nailing-allow earlier mobilization and more predictable fracture union but carry risks of iatrogenic RNP and infection. Management of primary RNP remains largely nonsurgical, with over 90% recovering spontaneously. Nonunion is frequently symptomatic and managed most often with compression plating. Surgery offers faster early recovery and lower nonunion rates, although long-term outcomes converge with successful bracing. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest surgery may be more economical when productivity loss is considered, particularly for working-age patients. Optimal treatment selection depends on patient age, activity level, fracture characteristics, and patient preference, emphasizing shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.