ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2026
TREAT: A Multicentre Cross-sectional TReatment Evaluation of Apparent Resistant hyperTension in Belgium.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of the TREAT study is to estimate the prevalence of true resistant hypertension in a Belgian setting of patients with apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH) and to evaluate which determining factor of pseudo-resistant hypertension contributes the most to this prevalence. TREAT is a single-visit, multicentric, non-interventional, cross-sectional survey. Inclusion criteria included: patients over 18 years receiving 3 or more antihypertensive molecules and referred to specialized hospital centers for aTRH. A total of 201 eligible patients were included. Only 56.7% of the patients were treated with the guideline recommended triple combination therapy (i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, calcium channel blocker and thiazide (-like) diuretic), and only 23.4% were treated with the maximal recommended dose. WCH was present in 8.7% of the 115 patients with available ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Therapeutic adherence was self-reported as good by 80% of patients, while 20% reported poor or moderate adherence. In this cohort, the prevalence (95% CI) of true resistant hypertension was estimated at 21.9% (14.7%-30.6%). Among patients referred to specialized centers for aTRH, about 3 out of 4 presented with pseudo-resistant hypertension. The occurrence of WCH and poor adherence appeared rather limited in our study, but half of the participants were polymedicated with non-recommended combinations of antihypertensive molecules. Inadequate dosing was observed in the majority of patients and a third was not using a single pill combination. Hence, pseudo-resistant hypertension seems to be mainly associated with the underuse of triple combination therapy and, most likely, with suboptimal dosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.