ReviewJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2026
Mechanisms underlying the waning of osteoanabolic therapy effects in osteoporosis.
Review in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoanabolic therapies such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs (teriparatide [TPT], abaloparatide [ABL]) and the sclerostin inhibitor romosozumab rapidly stimulate new bone deposition but their bone-building effects are not indefinite. Clinical trials including bone turnover markers and bone histomorphometry studies show that the initial gains in bone formation and density wane with continued therapy-typically within 12-18 mo for PTH analogs and even sooner for romosozumab. This invited review explores the biological mechanisms that may explain this waning response, including receptor desensitization at the PTH1 receptor level, depletion or saturation of bone-forming surfaces, exhaustion or downregulation of osteoblast progenitors, upregulation of endogenous Wnt pathway antagonists (eg, sclerostin, DKK1), and mechanostatic feedback from increased bone mass. The contrasting kinetics of TPT, ABL, and romosozumab are compared, highlighting how their modes of action (remodeling- vs modeling-based formation) influence the duration of anabolic activity. Finally, potential strategies to extend or rekindle anabolic effects are discussed-including sequential and combination therapies and adjunctive mechanical loading-with a view toward maximizing bone gains and reducing fracture risk. Understanding why anabolic drug efficacy attenuates provides insight into bone biology and guides the design of regimens to achieve more sustained increases in bone mass and strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.