ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026
Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance in a nutshell.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monoclonal Gammopathy of Thrombotic Significance.American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Anti-Platelet Factor 4 Antibody Clonal Heterogeneity and MGUS Status in HIT.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This nutshell review discusses the pathophysiology, diagnostic features, treatment strategies and avenues for future research in a recently identified thrombotic entity, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). MGTS is an anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody-mediated disorder distinct from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), as it involves the production of persistent, monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies. Several subtypes of MGTS, including 'HIT-like', 'VITT-like' and 'non-HIT/VITT-like', exhibit unique serological profiles that can complicate diagnosis. Recognition of 'HIT-like' MGTS is critical to avoid heparin exposure in these patients, which can result in adverse effects like those seen in heparin-exposed HIT patients. 'Non-HIT/VITT-like' MGTS antibodies have only been detected in PF4-enhanced functional testing; therefore, we recommend using these platelet-based tests as the front-line assay for detecting MGTS antibodies. Mass profiling using mass spectrometry is critical for the 'fingerprinting' of monoclonal antibodies to establish a diagnosis of MGTS. Treatments used in HIT and VITT, such as non-heparin anticoagulants and intravenous immunoglobulin G, are typically insufficient for managing MGTS. Emerging MGTS therapies, such as plasma cell-directed drugs and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are discussed. The review concludes with an emphasis on areas of future research in MGTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.