ArticleACS nano2026
Probing Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry in 2D Materials with Tailored-Light Photocurrent Generation.
Article in ACS nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bulk photogalvanic effect represents a powerful tool for generating photocurrents without external bias in light-matter systems that lack inversion symmetry. While these photocurrents are used in electronic applications such as current sources, switches, and photovoltaics, their presence can also be employed to probe material properties in and out of equilibrium. Here we advance this path of bulk photogalvanic photocurrent spectroscopy by utilizing tailored laser fields for ultrafast photocurrent generation to study time-reversal-symmetry (TRS) broken phases of matter in 2D systems. Combinations of bichromatic linearly polarized laser beams that separately respect mirror and time-reversal symmetries, individually precluding photocurrents, can break symmetries and generate photocurrents when combined. We show in graphene, both theoretically and experimentally, that specific choices of the relative polarization angle and two-color phase impose a forbidden photocurrent selection rule in TRS-invariant systems, as the tailored light maintains TRS while breaking all other symmetries. We then employ state-of-the-art ab initio simulations to validate this physical mechanism and, crucially, predict a broken photocurrent selection rule in materials with intrinsically broken TRS, such as the 2D magnet CrI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.