ArticlePain2026
Differentiating pain-related distress from depression in people with persistent musculoskeletal pain: a mixed methods study.
Article in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing "De-stress pain," an intervention to reduce chronic pain-related distress: Proof of concept and qualitative assessment of acceptability.British journal of pain · 2026Article
- Yonder: Working rurally, pain-related distress, access and experience, and tailored public health messaging.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractDepressive symptoms are commonly experienced by people with persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. There is evidence for some individuals that this may be best characterised as pain-related distress; a reaction to living with the impact of pain, rather than a depressive illness. No explorations exist of how to differentiate between these in primary care. This study aimed to explore key factors that may differentiate between pain-related distress and depression, and the effectiveness of existing symptom screening tools (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and 4-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire [4DSQ]) in identifying distress through a mixed methods approach. First, 21 general practitioners and 21 people with pain were interviewed about their experiences of pain-related distress. Second, 597 primary care patients with MSK pain completed a cross-sectional questionnaire study reporting on their pain, mental health symptoms, and other life events. Qualitative data suggested key factors distinguishing between pain-related distress and depression included general positive outlook, physical function, and acceptance. Quantitative findings showed that the PHQ-9 may overcategorise participants as depressed; of the 207 participants classified as distressed (but not depressed) on the 4DSQ, 118 (57%) were categorised as moderately or severely depressed on the PHQ-9. Lower positive outlook and sleep interference scores, and higher PHQ-9 and perceived stress scores significantly predicted participants experiencing distress only compared with distress and depression, matching the qualitative findings. These findings indicate that differentiation between pain-related distress and depression may be possible in primary care consultations for persistent musculoskeletal pain. This is essential to ensure that patients are offered appropriate, acceptable, and effective management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.