ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
A Remarkable Tale: Increased Retinal Fluorescence Following Application of Permanent Marker Ink to Mouse Tails.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Unusually high retinal fluorescence was observed during in vivo imaging among a few mice in our colony. Their tails had been marked with red Sharpie ink, a common practice for identification. They were observed licking the ink off their tails, suggesting possible oral intake of a fluorescent ink component that might accumulate in the retina. One component of red marker ink is the fluorophore Rhodamine 6G (R6G), suggesting that it might be responsible. Methods: We tested this hypothesis by tail marking C57Bl/6J mice with one line or four lines of red ink. Retinal fluorescence was monitored in vivo with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) imaging at baseline and from 6 hours to 2 weeks after marking. Retinas and brains were sectioned for histology. A second cohort of mice received an oral gavage of R6G at the concentration estimated in red ink, and retinal histology was performed. Results: Tail marking with red ink led to a transient, dose-dependent increase in retinal fluorescence in cSLO images, peaking at 6 hours. Histology revealed that this fluorescence was predominantly in the photoreceptor outer segments. This fluorescence localization was reproduced with oral R6G alone. Fluorescence in the brain was concentrated in the choroid plexus and ventricles. Conclusions: These results suggest that R6G can cross the gut-blood, blood-retina, and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. This raises important technical considerations for experimental mouse identification and has potential applications for fluorescence imaging and central nervous system drug targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.