ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Corticocerebellar Effective Connectivity During Adapting to vs. Ignoring Delayed Visual Movement Feedback.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Corticocerebellar Effective Connectivity During Adapting to vs. Ignoring Delayed Visual Movement Feedback.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internal models in the brain may enable flexible action control by calculating estimates of the body's state and predictions of the sensory consequences that its actions will produce. These processes are thought to be implemented by interactions among cortical and subcortical brain regions including the cerebellum. During a virtual reality based hand-target matching task, in which delayed visual movement feedback was behaviorally relevant (i.e., requiring visuomotor adaptation) or irrelevant (i.e., needed to be ignored), we had observed increased hemodynamic responses in the cerebellum (left Crus I/right Lobule VI), V5, and intraparietal sulcus during the adaptation condition. These activity changes suggested processes specific to delay-dependent adaptation. Here, we used dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to test if these regional activity changes could be explained in terms of task (i.e., adaptation)-dependent between-region connectivity changes. During visuomotor adaptation, DCM revealed an increased excitatory influence of the right cerebellum (Lobule VI) on bilateral V5 (and on the IPS), and an increased mutual excitation among the right cerebellum and the left IPS. Our results support the idea that the communication of cerebellar predictions to the cortical visuomotor network underlies visuomotor adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.