ArticleScience progress
Indoor positioning with self-adaption parameter optimization based on fingerprints.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WiFi fingerprinting remains a cornerstone of indoor localization, yet conventional KNN-based approaches suffer from high-dimensional noise and suboptimal parameter selection. While metaheuristic algorithms like GSA have been applied to optimize access point (AP) selection and K values, they often face high computational complexity in large-scale environments. This paper proposes SA-RLS-GSA-KNN, a novel two-stage optimization framework that integrates sparse-aware recursive least squares (SA-RLS) with the gravitational search algorithm (GSA) to optimize the parameters of KNN. First, SA-RLS with L1 regularization pre-screens critical APs by modeling RSS-position relationships, significantly reducing the search space. Second, GSA fine-tunes the final AP subset and optimal K value within this reduced space using a multi-objective fitness function balancing positioning error, feature count, and computational cost. The evaluation was conducted on 15 public datasets such as UJIIndoorLoc. The average positioning error achieved by SA-RLS-GSA was more than 20% lower than that of the baseline KNN algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.