Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41841352›Full record

ReviewJournal of economic entomology2026

Is the long-horned grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) a novel, nutritious, functional, and safe alternative food product? A review.

Margaret Kababu, Collins Mweresa, Dorothy Nakimbugwe, Geoffrey Ssepuuya, Karlmax Rutaro, Nicodemus Matojo, Faith Nyamu, Robert Mbeche, Sevgan Subramanian, Sunday Ekesi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of economic entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margaret KababuInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-1991
Collins MweresaDepartment of Biological Science, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST), Bondo, Kenya.
Dorothy NakimbugweDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0801-1049
Geoffrey SsepuuyaDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Karlmax RutaroDepartment of Biochemistry and Sports Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nicodemus MatojoFaculty of Agriculture, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Mwenge Catholic University, Moshi, Tanzania.
Faith NyamuInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Robert MbecheFood Program, World Resources Institute, Africa.Nairobi, Kenya.
Sevgan SubramanianInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-4447-0744
Sunday EkesiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Chrysantus TangaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-5788-7920

Funding

BioInnovate Africa 51050076BioInnovate Africa INSBIZ - Contribution ID No. 51050076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruspolia differens Serville (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) is among the most widely consumed edible insect in Eastern and Central Africa, where it contributes to both household nutrition and income generation. As a nutrient-dense food source, it offers a promising alternative to curb food insecurity and malnutrition. Despite this, the consumption and use of the grasshopper is limited to its seasonal availability when it is collected from the wild. Coupled with this, is limited evidence on its domestication despite research advances to optimize conditions for mass production. This review was conducted to highlight research advances and gaps on production, processing, nutritional profile, and safety of R. differens as a food source. Findings from the review revealed that R. differens is widely consumed in Africa. It is rich in protein (28% to 54%), fat (33% to 49%), amino acids, fatty acids, micronutrients, and antioxidants; however, its nutrient quality and shelf life are influenced by diverse processing methods. Studies have reported the presence of pathogenic microorganisms in some market samples, highlighting the need for improved hygiene and processing standards. Therefore, enabling policies, captive rearing, and safe processing of R. differens would be revolutionary in increasing its availability, consumption, and commercialization for improved food and nutrition security.

Indexed as

Edible InsectsFunctional FoodGrasshoppersNutritive ValueAnimalsFood Safetybiosafetyedible grasshopperfood securitynutritional qualityregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID41841352
PMCPMC13075823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.